I agree with all of this, but I needn't opine on sanctimonious posturers or calculated, often government-sponsorted iconoclasts; Burgess, then Dalrymple tackled those topics far more exhaustively or cogently than I could.
Social media is largely a cesspit, but so much of it that isn't censorially misadministered into oblivion is still distinguishable by popular dissent from legacy news outlets. A lot of people are dedicated to verity in counterposting, even if only by dint of burner accounts.
![[tfpXE] avatar](/site_screenshots/15/25/tfpxe/index.html.50x50.webp)
I agree with all of this, but I needn't opine on sanctimonious posturers or calculated, often government-sponsorted iconoclasts; Burgess, then Dalrymple tackled those topics far more exhaustively or cogently than I could.
Social media is largely a cesspit, but so much of it that isn't censorially misadministered into oblivion is still distinguishable by popular dissent from legacy news outlets. A lot of people are dedicated to verity in counterposting, even if only by dint of burner accounts.