Neocities

arlisplace updated Home

11 months ago

click.html

disuko updated ☆*:.｡.disuko's web corner｡.:*☆

11 months ago

1 like

toxxy updated toxxy homepage

11 months ago

directory/games/yume/index.html

directory/games/index.html

directory/index.html

humantooth doqmeat

11 months ago

love your masaaki yuasa watchlist! if you have a public library account you can watch Mind Game on Hoopla for free, one of my faves (https://www.hoopladigital.com/movie/mind-game-koji-imada/12175636)

3 likes

doqmeat 11 months ago

thank you so much! ahh i would use it but the service is not available where i live :')

1 like

drakul78 updated DraKul78's base

11 months ago

weblog/e549f0c5c540cb575b2d01503955b92b.html

1 like

disuko updated ☆*:.｡.disuko's web corner｡.:*☆

11 months ago

☆*:.｡.disuko's web corner｡.:*☆

postbox.html

1 like

cidoku updated cidoku.net

11 months ago

notes/journal.html

6 likes

rbuchanan 11 months ago

It's redolent of its age, but drives me nuts. Personally, I'm thankful for orthoepic reforms.

4 likes

rbuchanan 11 months ago

English is certainly less wild and wooly than it was, but the French would rightly sneer at this notion that our (frankly demented) orthography is especially consistent.

4 likes

cidoku 11 months ago

Oh it drives me nuts too. Maybe that's why I dig it. It's an intellectual exercise. Is that a long s or an f? Yeah.

4 likes

rbuchanan 11 months ago

I tried to read Canterbury Tales in its (semi-reconstructed) Middle English years ago. Your longanimity exceeds mine by leagues.

4 likes

ongezell 11 months ago

It's really interesting to compare the evolution of our languages across the ages, I think the earliest de facto Portuguese text I found was from the twelfth-century and it's completely readable, especially if you also know a bit of Spanish. I would say that Galician it's pretty close to what Portuguese was at that time, I mean, we were Galician-Portuguese after all

5 likes

ongezell 11 months ago

and even before that we had vulgar Latin which is also surprisingly understandable

4 likes

rbuchanan 11 months ago

What's also remarkable is the persisting mutual intelligibility of those, along with Fala and Eonavian. Then compare them (and esp. their grammar) to Catalan....!

4 likes

rbuchanan 11 months ago

Considering that its incomparably immane lexicon eventuated mostly from amalgamation and agglutination, the convoluted developments of English diachrony seem almost modest. After the slow merger of Anglo-Saxon with Anglo-Norman, vast lexical influxions from 20+ languages over not quite a millennium resulted in less inflectional reduction than that of simpler languages (as Mandarin) over half that span.

3 likes

ongezell 11 months ago

All latin based languages are in a certain way highly mutually intelligible, at least textual form. with the exception of Romanian I think, that became a Slavic romance language of sorts. I was reading about this interesting constructed language called Romance Neolatino, It sounds soooooooo good and it's highly intelligible for romance speakers. I hope it gets some attention

4 likes

rbuchanan 11 months ago

Admittedly, Neolatin is appealing and agreeably dulcet -- much better than Esperanto! Romanian's grammar (notwithstanding enclitic definite articles) and verbal vocabulary are impeccably romance, but that Slavic influence in its nominal vocab. and phonology is unshakable. Nota bene: Romanians only fully jettisoned Cyrillic a century ago.

3 likes

rbuchanan 11 months ago

Your mention of mutual intelligibility reminded me of an amusing moment from "Sleuth," which I recently reviewed. Late in the third act, Michael Caine proffers a clue in Italian to frantic Laurence Olivier, who despises Italians but is conversant in Latin, by which he fenziedly deciphers the hinting epigram by tracing its cognates. >:P

3 likes

memocus updated Memocus Ultimatum

11 months ago

Memocus Ultimatum

toxxy updated toxxy homepage

12 months ago

directory/index.html

toxxy homepage

squidleafs updated A Little Thought Garden

12 months ago

cidoku updated cidoku.net

12 months ago

notes/journal.html

8 likes

ongezell 12 months ago

They made internet a service where we are the products for advertisers, doesn't help google basically monopolizing the internet as well with their engine

4 likes

cidoku 12 months ago

Let's give total control of the WWW to an ad company. What could go wrong? It's my belief that this all started with the WHATWG and the development of HTML5; this is the vital moment that gave g**gle its dominant role on the WWW today. They were developing the standards, so it's obvious that they'd make the best browser! They know how to play the long game.

4 likes

cidoku 12 months ago

We control what you see: Search engines. We control how you see it: Standards and web engines. How are you going to go against us?

4 likes

ongezell 12 months ago

yeah, still, that's the mainstream web, the web still a protocol everyone can use and improve upon, obviously, if we go our separated from the mainstream we will lose the benefits that made us too accommodated but at the end of the day it's us vs them, fuck big tech. I would rather have small circle just like the early web than what we have nowadays

3 likes

ongezell 12 months ago

Thank God I was lucky enough to live under that era, I miss it for sure

3 likes

cidoku 12 months ago

Yup, fortunately we know better. But I wish the rest could see it too.

3 likes

dc-blog 12 months ago

At this rate, we're going to be better off making our own internet.

1 like

rbuchanan 11 months ago

A quarter-century ago, corporations and the subhuman marketers who they employ determined that the Internet should be like teevee: crammed with obnoxious and ubiquitous ads, and all manner of trashy glut. The results speak for themselves.

1 like

rbuchanan 11 months ago

The W3C is so brazenly perfidious that I'm stupefied that anyone is still using their shitty, needless validators. Use weblint.

1 like

mikegrindle

12 months ago

Here’s a friendly reminder to all you wonderful web masters out there to add/update a robots .txt file to your site if you don’t fancy bots scraping everything you’ve made.

7 likes

mikegrindle 12 months ago

A new enabler of mediocrity to add to your file: Applebot-Extended

1 like

mikegrindle 12 months ago

Feel free to pinch mine: https://mikegrindle.com/robots.txt

5 likes

getoffmylawn 12 months ago

Thank you, keep forgetting to create one and just did it!

2 likes

owlroost 12 months ago

One to add for you: User-agent: TurnitinBot

3 likes

colexdev 12 months ago

Thanks! I have one that is pretty extensive so far, I will add anything from yours that I do not have as well as the TurnitinBot that @owlroost mentioned! Thanks all

2 likes

punk-tart 12 months ago

Do we just add it anywhere on our website?

2 likes

mikegrindle 11 months ago

Thanks for the recommendation, Owlroost. I’ll be sure to add that. @punk-tart, it should go in your site’ root directory (so, not in a “folder”, but the same place as you homepage - hope that makes sense). Cheers all.

2 likes

punk-tart 11 months ago

Thanks for the clarification, added and good to go! Always appreciate dodging AI

2 likes

toxxy updated toxxy homepage

12 months ago

toxxy homepage