Neocities

macrowavent

5 months ago

happy winter!!

1 like

macrowavent updated SKULLCAVE !!

5 months ago

SKULLCAVE !!

autumn.html

keeperofhoney macrowavent

5 months ago

thank god someone else thinks human after all is the best daft punk album

1 like

macrowavent 5 months ago

that's because it is

1 like

adornesibley macrowavent

5 months ago

Love your aesthetic! Also, killer taste in video games. <3 And thank you for following me!

2 likes

macrowavent 5 months ago

THANK U SO MUCH!!! love the design of the writies entry

1 like

adornesibley 5 months ago

Thank you! That was definitely the hardest part of the website to design, so far. XD

1 like

wallace-online macrowavent

5 months ago

these colors are eth pretty :0

4 likes

macrowavent 5 months ago

thanks!!!1!!!

3 likes

macrowavent

6 months ago

my fella decided to make this 30th of april the new macrowavent day, yayyy!! go on and start following him, he's a cool artist. https://www.instagram.com/p/DJEfVtLxRVV

macrowavent updated SKULLCAVE !!

7 months ago

SKULLCAVE !!

1 like

darkfr0stt skullmund

7 months ago

oh my God your site is so cool and fun I LOVE IT SO MUCHH

2 likes

macrowavent updated SKULLCAVE !!

8 months ago

1 like

macrowavent

8 months ago

happy autumn

1 like

macrowavent updated SKULLCAVE !!

8 months ago

SKULLCAVE !!

summer.html

1 like

darkfr0stt macrowavent

8 months ago

omg I am in love with your site!

1 like

macrowavent 8 months ago

THANKS, I love your library and I'm eager to see your ocs !!!

1 like

darkfr0stt 8 months ago

@macrowavent thank you!!

1 like

macrowavent updated SKULLCAVE !!

8 months ago

lonlonranch.html

skullmund updated SKULLMUND

8 months ago

SKULLMUND

7 likes

skullmund updated SKULLMUND

8 months ago

SKULLMUND

6 likes

skullmund goofyahhbingus

9 months ago

regarding lossless compression: Why do you think pngs should be converted to webp? I've made a png compression program and have found pngs to be consistently smaller if compressed well. jxl is best, but theres unfortunately no browser support yet

2 likes

goofyahhbingus 9 months ago

Well, in my tests I've gotten the opposite results, WEBPs being consistently smaller than PNGs. That's quite strange... Could you give me more info on how you compress PNGs? I'm rather curious about it!

2 likes

goofyahhbingus 9 months ago

Oh also some context on my workflow: I save images as PNG, compress them using Minuimus.pl, then I convert them to WEBP using libwebp (command being: cwebp -q 100 -lossless "[file]").

1 like

skullmund 9 months ago

i run optipng pngout and deflopt, theyre all lossless and pretty fast, makes for a small image already. then to shave off a few more bytes i run my own code which (somewhat brute-force) tries to find even better filter combinations / palette order / bit depth (8 might compress better than lower numbers, strange but true) and deflate with zopfli. i'll release it eventually but right now it only "works on my machine"

2 likes

goofyahhbingus 9 months ago

Oh nice, that's interesting. If I'm not mistaken Minuimus.pl internally uses pngout and optipng only. I'll have to check deflopt and zopfli now! And I can't wait for your code release, hoping it'll be open sorce! :))))

1 like

skullmund 9 months ago

i just downloaded libwebp and have to say, webp compresses a lot better now than im used to. some are actually smaller as webps now but the differences are only about 1-5% either way

2 likes

skullmund 9 months ago

i quickly tested 5 files: png is 109.742 bytes total and webp 108.946 although 3 out of 5 files are smaller as pngs. but tbfh the webp compression is nicer and faster

2 likes

skullmund 9 months ago

also tried jxl with the same 5 images and while it performs best on 3/5 images leaving 1/5 for png and 1/5 for webp, it actually has the highest total size because it messes up on the largest image (116.765). so from my quick test they all perform well and theres no clear winner

2 likes

skullmund 9 months ago

having the sizes be so similar makes me wonder which decodes fastest

2 likes

goofyahhbingus 8 months ago

I've also done a few tests myself using your method, and I did get a few PNGs that were better compressed than WEBPs. Maybe it's the way the images' pixels themselves are structured that decides it? Compression sure works in mysterious ways... :)))

1 like

skullmund 8 months ago

idk about the other formats but png applies filters to image rows before compressing with zlib. both steps are non-deterministic to get the optimal result, which is both the fun and the pain of png. heres a simple explanation if youre interested: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EFUYNoFRHQI

2 likes

skullmund updated SKULLMUND

9 months ago

SKULLMUND

6 likes

skullmund updated SKULLMUND

9 months ago

SKULLMUND

5 likes

skullmund updated SKULLMUND

9 months ago

SKULLMUND