Neocities

superkirbylover updated Checkered Hell

4 months ago

journal/posts/2024/Jun-17.html

work/index.html

webgarden.html

not_found.html

journal/posts/entryBase.html

journal/posts/2024/Mar-14.html

1 like

burhfart

4 months ago

tetyss is BACK!!!!!!!!!!!!!

burhfart 4 months ago

!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

evilgrandpa updated EvilGrandpa

4 months ago

killdale.html

1 like

sugarforbrains updated NOT FOR HUMAN CONSUMPTION

4 months ago

shrine/hoard/100/index.html

21 likes

cidoku updated The Cidoku Network

4 months ago

notes/journal.html

6 likes

rbuchanan 4 months ago

It's redolent of its age, but drives me nuts. Personally, I'm thankful for orthoepic reforms.

4 likes

rbuchanan 4 months ago

English is certainly less wild and wooly than it was, but the French would rightly sneer at this notion that our (frankly demented) orthography is especially consistent.

4 likes

cidoku 4 months ago

Oh it drives me nuts too. Maybe that's why I dig it. It's an intellectual exercise. Is that a long s or an f? Yeah.

4 likes

rbuchanan 4 months ago

I tried to read Canterbury Tales in its (semi-reconstructed) Middle English years ago. Your longanimity exceeds mine by leagues.

4 likes

ongezell 4 months ago

It's really interesting to compare the evolution of our languages across the ages, I think the earliest de facto Portuguese text I found was from the twelfth-century and it's completely readable, especially if you also know a bit of Spanish. I would say that Galician it's pretty close to what Portuguese was at that time, I mean, we were Galician-Portuguese after all

5 likes

ongezell 4 months ago

and even before that we had vulgar Latin which is also surprisingly understandable

4 likes

rbuchanan 4 months ago

What's also remarkable is the persisting mutual intelligibility of those, along with Fala and Eonavian. Then compare them (and esp. their grammar) to Catalan....!

4 likes

rbuchanan 4 months ago

Considering that its incomparably immane lexicon eventuated mostly from amalgamation and agglutination, the convoluted developments of English diachrony seem almost modest. After the slow merger of Anglo-Saxon with Anglo-Norman, vast lexical influxions from 20+ languages over not quite a millennium resulted in less inflectional reduction than that of simpler languages (as Mandarin) over half that span.

3 likes

ongezell 4 months ago

All latin based languages are in a certain way highly mutually intelligible, at least textual form. with the exception of Romanian I think, that became a Slavic romance language of sorts. I was reading about this interesting constructed language called Romance Neolatino, It sounds soooooooo good and it's highly intelligible for romance speakers. I hope it gets some attention

4 likes

rbuchanan 4 months ago

Admittedly, Neolatin is appealing and agreeably dulcet -- much better than Esperanto! Romanian's grammar (notwithstanding enclitic definite articles) and verbal vocabulary are impeccably romance, but that Slavic influence in its nominal vocab. and phonology is unshakable. Nota bene: Romanians only fully jettisoned Cyrillic a century ago.

3 likes

rbuchanan 4 months ago

Your mention of mutual intelligibility reminded me of an amusing moment from "Sleuth," which I recently reviewed. Late in the third act, Michael Caine proffers a clue in Italian to frantic Laurence Olivier, who despises Italians but is conversant in Latin, by which he fenziedly deciphers the hinting epigram by tracing its cognates. >:P

3 likes

kitsunezero4 updated kitsunezero4.neocities.org

4 months ago

home.html

video-2.html

burhfart

4 months ago

tildearrow should put an update detector in furnace cause my ass CANT wait longer for 0.6.4

burhfart

4 months ago

Oh, https://nitter.poast.org/Pirat_Nation/status/1800930975536537934#m

cidoku updated The Cidoku Network

4 months ago

notes/journal.html

8 likes

ongezell 4 months ago

They made internet a service where we are the products for advertisers, doesn't help google basically monopolizing the internet as well with their engine

4 likes

cidoku 4 months ago

Let's give total control of the WWW to an ad company. What could go wrong? It's my belief that this all started with the WHATWG and the development of HTML5; this is the vital moment that gave g**gle its dominant role on the WWW today. They were developing the standards, so it's obvious that they'd make the best browser! They know how to play the long game.

4 likes

cidoku 4 months ago

We control what you see: Search engines. We control how you see it: Standards and web engines. How are you going to go against us?

4 likes

ongezell 4 months ago

yeah, still, that's the mainstream web, the web still a protocol everyone can use and improve upon, obviously, if we go our separated from the mainstream we will lose the benefits that made us too accommodated but at the end of the day it's us vs them, fuck big tech. I would rather have small circle just like the early web than what we have nowadays

3 likes

ongezell 4 months ago

Thank God I was lucky enough to live under that era, I miss it for sure

3 likes

cidoku 4 months ago

Yup, fortunately we know better. But I wish the rest could see it too.

3 likes

dc-blog 4 months ago

At this rate, we're going to be better off making our own internet.

1 like

rbuchanan 4 months ago

A quarter-century ago, corporations and the subhuman marketers who they employ determined that the Internet should be like teevee: crammed with obnoxious and ubiquitous ads, and all manner of trashy glut. The results speak for themselves.

1 like

rbuchanan 4 months ago

The W3C is so brazenly perfidious that I'm stupefied that anyone is still using their shitty, needless validators. Use weblint.

1 like

burhfart

4 months ago

tetyys is down D: