elilenti
2 months ago
I went to an art museum yesterday, and felt these exact feelings. It was a great time, and I was happy that I went alone. Some parts of it were painful, and I was able to let that happen instead of maintaining social pleasantries.
floralchai
2 months ago
I think it is good to leave the internet for a while, go outside, and embrace the beauty of life. This is why I've been inactive for a while, had lot of fun when I focus more on what is real
floralchai
2 months ago
I don't need to maintain a connection that is toxic. Like someone who only say painful and negative things toward you. In any way we should not let that happen
heart143
5 months ago
added some more favorites in the library although my analyses are just surface level
heart143
6 months ago
thank you! It's been untouched for quite a while since I'm going through some change
onlytrichromatic
6 months ago
wholeheartly agree with this. I keep copies of all the VNs I like on a hard drive because the porn game sites I download them from will inevitably die!
sakana
6 months ago
I wish I adopted this idea sooner - there's quite a bit of art from Japanese Geocities sites (for an old game nobody knows/remembers) that's just gone forever now. I have a piece on the pinboard in my room that was printed out in 2005 and it may be the only surviving copy of this particular piece of art.
heart143
6 months ago
the online art community definitely influenced a lot of how we see art. a lot of arguments for not reposting art lie heavily on the monetization of art, which is an entire thing that also sucks. on the other hand is the intimacy of the art; I wouldn't want others repurposing something special that I created. but then if I really didn't want that to happen, I would know to not just share it online
heart143
6 months ago
art seeps deep. it's kinda wrong to birth such a thing into a big world only to leash it up. we really can't control what other people do to our art but I don't think we should see that as a bad thing unless it literally kills you or something
links are fundamental to the concept of webpages and so html was design to accomodate them. sites don't need javascript to translate a user's click into changing pages unless the changing of a page is intentionally being hidden. there are times when a button is better than an anchor link, but do know that these elements can induce unintended extra precaution in users that can make your site less accessible
Links are what make the web a web!
Why would anyone do it in a different way? That is so bizarre to me.
the websites I see with buttons instead of links usually have their navigation elements styled as buttons. I guess they thought since they want their nav to be button-like, they figured they should use the button tag. I think it would be best if buttons were reserved for executing actions that truly need javascript. anchor links can just be styled to look like buttons
I have read this very important p.s.a。🙂↕️