they really should have translated the title of "whatever" more literally

Interesting but I find the ties between nuclear family and sense of community weak, especially when you want to talk about subculture... is there even a subculture that wasn't formed by people breaking from their families' mainstream morals? Also found the argument of this Michael frenchguy, quite nonsensical, and if anything else the era o sexual freedom ended more than a decade ago [...]

[...] just look how comteporaneous post-modernists ("wokes") scrutinized works from the 60s and 70s, it's all so problematic and outdated, they need trigger warnings because they don't depict modern values, who are incrasily moralistic... I find quite hilarious when I see adults claiming they were "groomed", as if they aren't capable of desire and agency, they have no volition, they are children [...]

[...] who have to be taken care of and can't be responsible for their acts... that's the opposite of sexual revolution, because it meant saying "yeah, I want it, so what?" and taking reponsability for it... hell, people aren't even having sex nowadays anyway, I guess that's why it's so taboo - besides earning social points awarded as likes by signaling your good mainstream-aligned morals.

simulation > reality the plot was written when man "separated" himself from the natural

i hope you never get unalived by the lethalitymaxxers mr. wali

ps: I know the frenchguy argument isn't from a today's perspective, I just think what he is blaming "science" (perhaps as some view of it as "fordism"?) and sexual freedom are apples and oranges with individualism

i like the roots of the punk subculture, but it means nothing anymore.. "all of this means nothing, d.c. made me and the rest of this mess" - way back in 1999, capital finds a way to subvert anything