New Followers
mikanook,
dirtymachine,
victorswebsite,
perplexinghodgepodge,
lilunestudio,
rayepierre335,
eunbi2000,
naphthalenequeen21,
dogt00thoffice,
slothhh,
kireibi,
phenomenologyofk,
ohphobos,
pxhc,
northbox,
sunpurr,
rainsvoid,
issa-zzz,
pirahxcx,
catlover256,
aichzlyx,
theimaginarycrow,
teater-thoughts,
boobeep,
weisssyoung,
sickfilm,
lusinda,
greytanager,
nostalgica,
mtltransit,
zauggo,
lostindreamworld,
philiathequesadilla,
yanedoelle,
omzki,
isakafae,
kayt-buigh,
zzzpigeons,
danielmova,
timmyxholiday,
halfspacepig,
fezsav,
ostel,
cornycobb,
cormchip,
singularitty,
the-forested-whale,
deathisthemartyrofbeauty
4 likes
daliwali
1 month ago
i know that road... los angeles -> darkness and djinns -> strip mall -> empty plains -> las vegas.
4 likes
koilwood
1 month ago
>Daliwali: Driven on that road too many times to count. It's quite the isolating experience. But very beautiful indeed.
3 likes
9 likes
6 likes
>Words_vs_Symbols Yes and No. I agree with that it might be true for alphabets. But when it comes to things like ancient Egyption hieroglyphs or Kanji, the boundary is quite blurry.
1 like
>Words_vs_Symbols Words mean signs in languages. Symbols are a type of signs. Those are not mutually exclusive. That is the point of later Wittgenstein.
1 like
koilwood
2 months ago
Symbols and words are not mutually exclusive, but most of the limitations of words are not present in the world of visual symbols. Symbols do not require definitions the same way language does. In this way, symbols retain a more fluid and somewhat immortal way of being.
2 likes
๐๐ฝ'๐ผ 404๐ฒ๐ท๐ฐ ๐ซ๐พ๐ฝ ๐ฝ๐ฑ๐ฎ๐ป๐ฎ ๐ฒ๐ผ ๐ฒ๐ท๐ญ๐ฎ๐ฎ๐ญ ๐ช๐ท ๐พ๐น๐ญ๐ช๐ฝ๐ฎ//