I continue to think about an anecdote related in Soseki's novel Mon of a geisha who read the Analects over and over and talked about Confucius's disciples like they were characters in a tv show
note no. 4 made me smile lol. great points about how "great classics" were viewed in their time though; i wonder what books/tv shows/etc. from our time will be revered as classics later on. maybe one of those uninspired booktok romance novels bc they're indicative of this era? i mean romeo and juliet was mid too
you never know, especially in america there's a long history of writers being rediscovered and appreciated only far after their own time..."Vast populations, towering cities, erroneous and clamorous publicity, have conspired to make unknown great men one of America's traditions. Edgar Allan Poe was one of these; so was Melville."-jlb
"analyzing themes" can also be fun outside of a school context. i see it as a form of play. i despised english class but now i act like an english teacher online...
reading can be so performative too (either listing/reviewing what you've read publicly or holding the "aesthetically correct" book on the subway) that people approach reading joylessly... i gotta read The Classics so i can impress The Onlookers... agreed re: reading has developed this patina of ERUDITION that so need not be the case
don quixote is interesting because it really does feel like it contains every idea in any novel ever written subsequently. also a "cute girls reading" anime does exist (Bernard-jou Iwaku) and as one of the MAL reviews points out, actually faithfully replicates several aspects of 2016-era /lit/ discourse (the power of convergent evolution).
I continue to think about an anecdote related in Soseki's novel Mon of a geisha who read the Analects over and over and talked about Confucius's disciples like they were characters in a tv show
you should read The Carnal Prayer Mat. it might help for your VN research
note no. 4 made me smile lol. great points about how "great classics" were viewed in their time though; i wonder what books/tv shows/etc. from our time will be revered as classics later on. maybe one of those uninspired booktok romance novels bc they're indicative of this era? i mean romeo and juliet was mid too
you never know, especially in america there's a long history of writers being rediscovered and appreciated only far after their own time..."Vast populations, towering cities, erroneous and clamorous publicity, have conspired to make unknown great men one of America's traditions. Edgar Allan Poe was one of these; so was Melville."-jlb
"analyzing themes" can also be fun outside of a school context. i see it as a form of play. i despised english class but now i act like an english teacher online...
very true - i like reading classics but i find myself doubting if im 'reading it the right way'.
reading can be so performative too (either listing/reviewing what you've read publicly or holding the "aesthetically correct" book on the subway) that people approach reading joylessly... i gotta read The Classics so i can impress The Onlookers... agreed re: reading has developed this patina of ERUDITION that so need not be the case
don quixote is interesting because it really does feel like it contains every idea in any novel ever written subsequently. also a "cute girls reading" anime does exist (Bernard-jou Iwaku) and as one of the MAL reviews points out, actually faithfully replicates several aspects of 2016-era /lit/ discourse (the power of convergent evolution).