Neocities.org
>Locality-...-Epistemology I got it. Thank you. In fact that you suddenly end up going general relativity in the end shows that QM is not the subject. It was the motivation. Since I seriously think the world is mental, for me mathematics is already more real than the physical world. But you needed a physical justification and it was a great exemplar. By the way, the post reminded me of context-sensitive languages.
1 like
>Locality-...-Epistemology To be honest, the problem is nothing new and it precedes QM far before. And it doesn't have to be scientific at all. But I really like the algebraic approach: To solve a problem, invent a general tool that overkills it.
2 likes
4 likes
3 likes
>Some-Haikus Those are not Haikus. Those are Senryus. That's not wrong though. https://www.japanvault.com/haiku-vs-senryu-poems-whats-the-difference/
1 like
polydactica
1 month ago
Thanks. The first two are haikus. I gave up on keeping up that pacing though.
Have you any currency from Užupis? Wikipedia https://en.wikipedia.org › wiki › Užupis
2 likes
mnbanknotes
1 month ago
Yes! You can check the EuroUžas by clicking on the "Europe" button on the left :)
1 like
polydactica
1 month ago
I love it! This is very cool what you're doing. I mostly just look at the updates you post, but I really appreciate you preserving this little bit of history. Micronations are cool as hell
1 like
QM isn't the subject; it is the object. It is the setting in which the universal dilemma unfurls. And picking on physics lets us see that contextuality is not just an abstraction or a subjective/uniquely-human phenomenon, but is embedded into the very bedrock of the physical reality. For those reasons, I think it is useful to target quantum theory (not just QM specifically)