virtually-isolated
3 months ago
I understand how the creator of the format was "It's really effiecient!" but nothing in the world supports it properly ever despite it coming from Google. So... I kinda loathe it.
lakestheguy
3 months ago
i have mixed feelings about webp. the concept of a compressed image that still supports transparency and animation is cool. but the problem is: you can't use it as a wallpaper, can't use it in some software etc etc. also it's in spite of being owned by google
xsolimini
3 months ago
kinda have the same opinion as both comments above, the lack of support for this format is a bit annoying (even though the programs i use supports webp) but i kinda despise the jfif format more lol
owthehedge
3 months ago
conceptually good but nothing supports it and i have to use an extension to convert it into a normal png or gif because of afformentioned nothing supporting it. good idea but useless in practice
kolala
3 months ago
I've been a wiki editor and had to convert hundreds of WEBP images to PNGs to be able to edit them...the lack of support is a pain so I kind of hate them for that.
logicpng
3 months ago
i think blaming the format itself on low support for it is strange. it Does make it inconvenient to use but its small filesize is what allows me to have a gallery on my site, while being unable to pay the supporter fee for larger storage
maehat
3 months ago
i really wouldn't care about having to use if it didn't take forever for it to have any support
Same, though its mostly cuz Im either dissociating or relaxing
i do this too its kinda unhealthy