Thricegreat's Webpage
412,321 views
107 followers
7,663 updates
0 tips
1 like
>Locality-...-Epistemology I got it. Thank you. In fact that you suddenly end up going general relativity in the end shows that QM is not the subject. It was the motivation. Since I seriously think the world is mental, for me mathematics is already more real than the physical world. But you needed a physical justification and it was a great exemplar. By the way, the post reminded me of context-sensitive languages.
1 like
>Locality-...-Epistemology To be honest, the problem is nothing new and it precedes QM far before. And it doesn't have to be scientific at all. But I really like the algebraic approach: To solve a problem, invent a general tool that overkills it.
![[corbiss] desktop avatar](/site_screenshots/11/86/corbiss/index.html.50x50.webp)
QM isn't the subject; it is the object. It is the setting in which the universal dilemma unfurls. And picking on physics lets us see that contextuality is not just an abstraction or a subjective/uniquely-human phenomenon, but is embedded into the very bedrock of the physical reality. For those reasons, I think it is useful to target quantum theory (not just QM specifically)