Thricegreat's Webpage
417,528 views
107 followers
7,724 updates
0 tips
2 likes
kaa
thricegreat
2 months ago
> (A weird dialectic) I understand where you're coming from, and I agree with some of your viewpoint, but not all of it. I don't have a clear understanding of who you are, or where you are in life: because of that, I can't gauge if this is an appropriate conversation to have with you. We can wax poetic any time, but some things are best left to experience.
2 likes
>kaa (A weird dialectic) Also since you wrote about sex, to write about it, I have always thought that sex must be a spiritual union manifesting love. It is the final form of romantic body touches like hand holding. I scorn people who degrade it into a merely bodily function. Also a rule of thumb: If you feel vanity after an orgasm instead of happiness and satisfaction, what you did was fundamentally wrong.
4 likes
>kaa (A weird dialectic) Sharing sufferings is good. You don't need to suffer for the sake of art because it is beautiful. Also sometimes sharing sufferings just makes others suffer and does nothing more.
1 like
>kaa (The false dichotomy) If I make an analogy, I don't think lily "exists as a plant" and calcium "exists as a mineral". They simply "exist". Being a plant or a mineral are their properties. Similarily I think a desk and Santa Claus simply "exist". I don't think each belongs to different ontological classes.
1 like
>kaa (Leave no trace behind) It is not truly my opinion. But at that time I really felt like that. So I wrote like that. I thought of Pythagoras and Socrates at that time. They were great philosophers, but they didn't write any book.
>kaa (Thinking and Existing) I use "Existing" as "Being a part of Monad". Monad is the largest thing you belong to.
>kaa (Irrational feeling) Someone like Schopenhauer would eagerly argue that your sexual organs exist because of your sexual desires instead. Nietzsche too. Your body is your materialised Will in that case.
>kaa (Message, &c.) Might not be related, but I think using a computer as an analogy of the world has a problem. A computer is discrete. Though it mimics continuity with things like floating points. Natural numbers alone can't describe all of complex numbers.
![[corbiss] desktop avatar](/site_screenshots/11/86/corbiss/index.html.50x50.webp)
