everything is representational, any difference is a matter of degree at most (probably not even that), "non representational" art still only has meaning insofar as it recalls objects in the real world, because people actually live in the world and shapes or "forms" are derived from real objects, not the other way around (basically what I said in my little article)
yeah between that and the alternative aesthetics deriving from representation seems much more tenable.. at the end as well, the idea of atemporal+acultural judgement is pretty dubious
everything is representational, any difference is a matter of degree at most (probably not even that), "non representational" art still only has meaning insofar as it recalls objects in the real world, because people actually live in the world and shapes or "forms" are derived from real objects, not the other way around (basically what I said in my little article)
yeah between that and the alternative aesthetics deriving from representation seems much more tenable.. at the end as well, the idea of atemporal+acultural judgement is pretty dubious