I previously posted an essay, in your comments, on my interest in your findings (this site is old, and can, yet rarely, have issues such as misappropriate deletion), as well as my concerns on replication and accuracy. Your charts do not follow the standard process of experimentation, the scientific method, i understand i am ignorant about the topic, variables, goals, and process.
With the credibility issues being addressed, the "publications" you have made via public charts, data, and measurements, seem flawed. There is no way, with the publications available, to prove your findings, or even prove the experiment as valid. As far as i am concerned, the publications are used as subjects of bewilderment to a curious audience. I wish you to indulge me. Instagram -> @qqqqshanepppp
With the credibility issues being addressed, the "publications" you have made via public charts, data, and measurements, seem flawed. There is no way, with the publications available, to prove your findings, or even prove the experiment as valid. As far as i am concerned, the publications are used as subjects of bewilderment to a curious audience. I wish you to indulge me. Instagram -> @qqqqshanepppp