i. just. delay my learning. i love to learn and shit; i actually do but they dont wanna learn
@chipsfunfun indeed. Its really annoying too because now they're online 24/7 too yet somehow don't know how to use it.
weird thing is that I'm queer and we're still friends lol. he's becoming one of us /joke
Tbh I don't even know much about the protestant vs Catholic vs Orthodox thing. Most I know is some stuff I read off Wikipedia (which, being Wikipedia, isn't reliable in many cases). @chipsfunfun xd
@thricegreat tho if I had to take a guess, I'd probably end up on Protestant side. Orthodox seems like a good idea from what I can tell tho, so I'll look through whatever I can find on it XD
Now I'm not sure if I'm intelligent or retarded. I believe I'm on the retarded end of the spectrum. On one hand, didn't go to school for nearly 2 years yet still pass everything fine with barely any effort, but on the other hand, I am a little retarded (then again, so are all people my age).
You greatly overestimate the intellect of the average school-going kid. Believe me.
@cidoku probably true, and my school (which is already VERY bad) is likely still above a good majority of schools.
terminally online people like myself. If we manage to get 20 terminally online people for blogs, polls, groups, etc then we may unironically have an empire waiting to happen. We wouldn't even need multiple accounts each, yet we could control Paint even more than we already do. Idk, I'll have to think on it. Ofc, I don't abuse alt-accounts for my bidding as I have standards and people I war against do not either, but
still. Also, I find it funny how poorly put together most pro-LGBT arguments seem to be by many people. Its just "uhm u must seperate state/religion + sexuality/religion", "2000 year old book", etc. Hell, Thi500's retarded comment just ignores the Bible like the sub-80 IQ idiot he is.
(https://3dspaint.com/blog?id=101957#433627) for one, you can "disagree" with LGBT. By his logic, you couldn't "disagree" with anything because it's "none of your business what people are or how they choose to live". Secondly, "you don’t respect lgbt because a book said to. you respect them because it’s the right thing to do" is merely an opinion with no actual conclusive reasoning given to respect them, ironic since
"le bible" or whatever they'd say is arguably far more of a moral-code than just "its right because uhm yes". You could at least list a reason, of which even I can do. Thirdly, "im not religious but i know Jesus was a real guy and he would absolutely despise modern christians. Yall are a joke lmfao" ignores the fact that the Bible itself condemns homosexuality. Even if it did not, and even if he despised us now, he
would despise modern-Christianity for FAR different reasons than Thick ball disorder over here thinks. To put it simply, no, Jesus was not a queer-supporting man. Biblically that seems like a hell no, and even if we went by what historians say only, he probably wouldn't have supported LGBT still.
I don't have the energy to argue with anti-Christians, I wasted it all being one. Stay strong in Christ, brother.
TLDR: Jesus was not like "shiiiiiit man u can suk dik all u waont n shiet we in da hood n it fine", not Biblically and probably not "historically".
@didntask I find it entertaining in a way, usually because it is so poorly thought out. I can generally get the proof to refute claims by mere quick searches. And their ONLY arguments are "you see, if I interpret it so poorly it can fit my definition, it actually isnt against *insert obvious sin*! bigot"
@chipsfunfun to be fair tho, even more liberal views back then would probably be considered pretty far from liberal today.
Also yes, I'm going to sort my coins by type in different plastic-bags. Its insane how many coins I just find on the ground, hell I found like $0.50 minimum today off the ground.